•  
  •  

Yahoo! brass scoffs at Bing – “Won’t save Microsoft search”

By hugofirth On June 4, 2009 Share 3 Comments

Yesterday thebusinessinsider.com reported that the CEO of Yahoo Carol Bartz gave bing the rough side of her tongue, claiming it wouldn’t create that long carol-bartz-new-yahoo-ceoterm shift in the search market share that microsoft so desperately want.

Prediciting the new search engines inevitable (as she see’s it) fade into obscurity, following on from the initial period of interest  that Bing will currently be enjoying, Bartz said It’s interesting but not over-the-top interesting, People will keep the same habits.”

So Bing has failed to impress everyone then, but on the other hand – what else could one expect the CEO of Yahoo! to say about microsofts new baby ? She was hardly likely to shower it in praise if you ask me, what with the whole Yahoo!/Microsoft deal debacle still ongoing, and the fact that they are direct competitors, fighting over market share.

The comments are to be taken with a pinch of salt then, but perhaps there is something to take away from this. Bing is Live with a lick of paint, a very good lick of paint to be fair … but underneath its still the same old search we know and use every day. The search that google still does perfectly well .

binglogoThis creates a bit of a problem, because lets face it – people are lazy and habitual. It takes quite a shock to knock your average internet user out of a rut. Google is comfortable, familiar and still gets the job done – so the vast majority of people aren’t likely to shift for more of the same. If you want some of that terrifying Mountain View market share then Microsoft, you need to do it different, not just better!

Part of the reason people get so excited about twitter, or wolfram alpha , is they offer a service that is totally new. Twitter stumbled upon real-time search, and now even Sergey Brin himself wants a piece of it. Wolfram alpha has caused less of a buzz, but in my opinion they have managed to avoid the likely fatal label of ‘Google Killer’ by doing something so differently, that any such comparison doesn’t hold much water.

Microsoft was closer to the mark then, with their Ms. Dewey campaign back in 2006. (Ok … I’m pretty sure that bombed as a project, but it is doing something so differently as to create a sustained buzz … and that is what Bing desperately needs)

Maybe I’ll be proved wrong, and microsoft will snatch a large market share. That would be good for competition, so I hope I am wrong (to an extent, my ego is pretty fragile :P ). What are any of your thoughts on the new engines chances, will it be the revitalisation that microsoft intended, or will it end up a bit of a wet attempt ?

Please Share:
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Suggest to Techmeme via Twitter
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us

Related Posts

  • No Related Posts
3 comments - add yours
Tux

June 5, 2009

That’s the trouble with being the biggest (referring to Google): everything similar that comes after you is going to be labeled a “killer”.

I personally just found out about Bing today from another tech blog. While I haven’t tried it myself, I’m sure it works just fine, and might give it a shot at work tomorrow. You are right, however: habits are hard to change. My homepage is Google, and Google it will probably remain. People stay with what’s comfortable.

In order for anything to be a “Google killer”, it’s going to have to do much more than just search. Even if it does it well, Google’s mere size is going to overshadow anything that comes along after it.

[Reply]

Search Guru

June 5, 2009

Bartz is horrible as CEO. She will eventually bring Yahoo Search to a second tier engine. It’s algorithms are from the 90-ies, advertisers are turning their backs at yahoo due to horrible match driver, and she has not comitted enough resources to invest in search. Bartz, with you on board, Yahoo is in dire straits. Bing will eat your market share (unfortunatelly).

[Reply]

hugofirth

June 5, 2009

I have to admit, that before this writing this article I didn’t know a huge amount about her. It is unfortunate (and more than a little ironic) that 2 days after she makes those comments Search Guru’s predictions are shown to be true: http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/05/did-bing-just-leapfrog-yahoo-search/

[Reply]